SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 316

BELA M.TRIVEDI
Rajasthan Rajya vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Manglam Cement Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties all the four appeals are heard finally at the admission stage.

2. All the four appeals arise out of the common order dated 18-2-2012 passed by the Addl. District Judge No. 9, Jaipur Metropolitan Court, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as Court below) in Applications being Civil Misc. Application (Arbitration) Nos. 438/11, 439/11, 440/11 and 445/11, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), whereby the Court below has allowed the said applications filed by the respective respondents-applicants in all the matters, and has restrained the appellant-non-applicant from proceeding further with the notice inviting tender (NIT for short) dated 24-8-2011 and also from causing any obstruction to the respondent-companies in the supply of fly ash till the pendency of the arbitration proceedings that may be initiated between the parties.

3. The short facts giving rise to the present appeals are that the appellant company is engaged in the process of electricity generation, having its thermal power plant at Kota and the respondent-companies are the companies registered unde






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top