SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(HP) 34

V.P.GUPTA
DAWARKA DASS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioners:Shri H.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For Respondents:Shri L.S. Panta, Deputy Advocate: General.

JUDGMENT

V. P. Gupta, J.—This petition has been filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter shortly called the Code) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India and section 397 of the Code, by the petitioner challenging the order passed on 25th February, 1980 upon an application filed under section 311 of the Code by the petitioner for recalling the prosecution witnesses who had been examined in the case on 14th January, 1980.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was prosecuted tinder section 353 I.P.C. and section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, and he was charge-sheeted for the said offences on 14th May, 1979. The petitioner did not plead guilty to the charges framed against him and claimed to be tried. The Magistrate fixed the case for the evidence of the prosecution for 28th June, 1979. On 28th June, 1979, the whole of the prosecution evidence could not be examined because the counsel for the petitioner stated that be was not feeling well and had developed some trouble while coming from his house to the courts. One formal witness, Nar Singh S.H.O. was, however, examined on 28th June, 1979, and the remaining witnesses were b

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top