SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(HP) 76

V.D.MISRA, H.S.THAKUR
DWARKOO – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellants/Petitioners:Chhabil Das, Advocate. For Respondents:Inder Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

H. S. Thakur, J.—The appellants/petitioners have filed this application praying that the appeal be proceeded with and disposed of, without bringing on record unknown legal representatives of the deceased Bardoo (previously respondent No. 9).

2. The facts relevant to dispose of this petition may be briefly stated. Bardoo deceased was one of the respondents in this appeal. He is stated to have died on 9th March, 1979. After the appellants came to know about the death of Bardoo they filed an application (C, M. P. No. 728 of 1979) for bringing his legal representatives on record. Since there was a short delay in filing the application, an application No. C. M. P. 729/197i> was also filed by the appellants to condone the delay. Both the applications were allowed by this Court. By an order dated 21st of August, 1979 Shri Sukh Dev alias Dev, was ordered to be brought on record, as the legal representative of the deceased. On 28th of May, 1980 Shri Arun Goel Advocate, appeared on behalf of Sukh Dev alias Dev, and made a statement that the deceased had disposed of his property by way of will in favour of some other person, and Sukh Dev has no interest in it. He further stated that t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top