SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(HP) 1

T.U.MEHTA
MOHAR SINGH PREM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For petitioner:Shri Inder Singh, Advocate. For respondent:Advocate: General.

JUDGMENT

T. U. Mehta, J.—This revision application is filed against the Order passed by the learned Special Judge, District Sirmur at Nahan in Cr. M. P. No. 18-N/4 of 1977 on 7-12-1977 with regard to the disposal of the case property under section 457, Cr. P. C The case of the prosecution is that the present petitioner, who is accused of the offences under section 379/42/467/ 468/ 120 B, I. P. C, read with section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, has felled some trees belonging to the Government and, therefore, certain pieces of timber which the petitioner has obtained from these felled trees are stolen property. It is found that the police, during the investigation, has seized this property, and thereafter on 9-11-1977, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, C.

1. D. (Crime), Himachal Pradesh, Simla made an application to the learned Special Judge for auction of this property as contemplated by section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The respondent in reply to this petition submitted that he had filed a civil suit in the High Court in respect of this timber, which is treated by the prosecution as case property, and that he should be given an opportunity to establish













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top