SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(HP) 57

T.U.MEHTA, D.B.LAL
MAJOR R. K. VOL GOLDSTAIN – Appellant
Versus
STANLEY HAQUE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For petitioners:Sri Joseph Dina Nath. Advocate. For respondent:Sri Bakshi Sita Ram. Advocate.

JUDGMENT

T. U. Mehta, C. J.—The learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Simla has framed charge against both the petitioners for the offence under section 454, and the same section read with section 109, I P. C. The respondent No. 1 Shri Stanley Haque, who is officiating Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Bishop Cotton School, filed a private complaint against the present petitioners and one other for the offences under sections 454 and s48, I. P. C. On this complaint, the learned Magistrate issued summons under Section 448, I.P.C. Thereafter, evidence offered by the complainant was recorded and ultimately after hearing the learned Advocates of the parties the learned Magistrate has framed charge against these two petitioners, as stated above, on 1st March 1975 and discharge the original accused No. 2. 2. Being aggrieved by this order of the learned Magistrate, the present petitioners, against whom the charge has been framed, have approached this Court in this revision.

3. It appears that on 5th September, 1975 this matter came up before a learned single Judge of this Court, and at the time of hearing before him a preliminary objection was raised to the effect that the orde



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top