H.S.THAKUR, V.P.BHATNAGAR
KRISHAN – Appellant
Versus
KRISHANOO – Respondent
H. S. Thakur, J.—This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the decree and judgment of the learned Single Judge dated November 9f 1973, who affirmed the decree and judgment passed by the Jearned Additional District Judge.
2. A few facts relevant to decide this appeal may be stated. The land in dispute is one-fourth share in Khasra Nos. 35, 38, 2/2, 3, 4, 53/2, 57,58/2,39, 45 and 52 measuring 43 bighas and 2 biswas situated in village Bamta. In order to understand this case, it is necessary to set out the genealogical table which gives the relationship of the parties and, to make certain observations: Balku Kahna Jalam Jagta Kalia Bhola (Mst. Phini widow) Masadi (died issueless) Lobhi Deft. 6) Negi Deft. 5) Gopal (Deft. 4) Jiwanoo (died issueless). Sardaroo Budhoo (Deft. 1) Jagarnath (Deft. 2) Anantia (Deft, 3)
3. Scot. Phini deceased made a gift of her one-fourth share in the above land in favour of Krishanoo Ram plaintiff The plaintiff applied to the revenue authorities for the partition of his one-fourth share. S/Shri Budhu, Jagarnathu and Anantia (defendants No. 1 to 3) opposed the application. Consequently, the plaintiff was directed by an order dated 31-1-1962 to get
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.