SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(HP) 35

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh
P.D.DESAI
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. - Appellant
Versus
TILAK RAM - Respondent
F. A. O. (M, V. A.) No. 158 of 1984
Decided On : 04/19/1985

Advocates Appeared:
For the appellant (s) Shri R. M. Suri and K, D. Sood, Advocates. For the respondents (s) Shri Dalip Kumar Sharma and Rajiv Kumai Sharma, Advocates, for the respondents 2 and 3. Notice to other respondents not ordered to issue.

A person holding a learner's driving permit is "duly licensed" within the meaning of section 96(2)(b)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.

Headnote:

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1939 - SECTION 96(2)(B)(II) - INSURANCE - LIABILITY OF INSURANCE COMPANY - LEARNER'S DRIVING PERMIT HOLDER - WHETHER DULY LICENSED - INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 96(2)(B)(II) - EFFECT OF LEARNER'S DRIVING PERMIT - BREACH OF CONDITION OF POLICY - STATUTORY POLICY - SCOPE AND EFFECT - REMEDY OF INSURANCE COMPANY AGAINST OWNER OF MOTORCYCLE.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant-Insurance Company challenged the award of compensation by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) to the claimants on the ground that the driver of the insured vehicle, who held a learner's driving permit, was not "duly licensed" as required by the policy of insurance and that there was a breach of the condition of the policy which excluded the driving of the vehicle by a person who is not duly licensed.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the expression "duly licensed" in section 96(2)(b)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, must be construed to mean a person who holds a permit or authority, by whatever name called, granted in accordance with law by the Licensing Authority. Since the driver of the insured vehicle held a learner's driving permit, which is issued in accordance with law by the Licensing Authority, he was "duly licensed" and there was no breach of the condition of the policy.

Issues: 1. Whether a person holding a learner's driving permit is "duly licensed" within the meaning of section 96(2)(b)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939? 2. Whether the carrying of a pillion rider on a two-wheeled motor-cycle driven by a person holding a learner's driving permit is a breach of the condition of the policy?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted section 96(2)(b)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, to mean that a person who holds a permit or authority, by whatever name called, granted in accordance with law by the Licensing Authority, is "duly licensed". 2. The court held that the proviso to Rule 2.14 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, which dispenses with the requirement of the presence of an instructor in the case of a person driving a two-wheeled motor-cycle, does not impose a prohibition against the carrying of a person on the pillion or on a side car attached to such a vehicle.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed and the amount deposited in the Registry of the Court was ordered to be paid to the claimants.

JUDGMENT

P D. Desai, C. J.~ A fatal accident, which occurred on April 5, 1982, on account of the rash and negligent driving of a motor vehicle, namely, a motor-cycle, by the first respondent, resulted in a claim petition and in an award being made in favour of the second and third respondents (original claimants) in the sum of Rs, 8,220 with interest but no costs. The aw; rd is under challenge in the present appeal at the instance of the Insurance Company which has been made liable to satisfy the sward. 7wo grounds were urged in support of the appeal : first, that there has been a breach of a specified condition of the policy which authorised the driving of the insured vehicle only by a person who holds "a valid driving licence at the time of the accident or had held a permanent driving licence (other than a learners licence) and is not disqualified from holding or obtaining such a licence" and, secondly, that there was a breach of the provisions of Rule 2.14 of the Punjab Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") which prohibited a pillion rider when the vehicle was being driven by a person holding a permit to drive as a learner and, as such, the person driving the vehicle could not be regarded as lawfully driving the same pursuant to such permit. To determine the validity of the submissions, the relevant statutory provisions need to be referred to at the outset.

2. Section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") is the definition section. It defines the words "driving licence" in clause (5-A) to mean "the document issued by a competent authority under Chapter-II authorising the person specified therein to drive a motor vehicle or a motor vehicle of any specified class or description." The word "licence" is not separately defined. The words "motor vehicle" are defined in clause (18) to mean "any mechanically propelled vehicle adapted for use upon roads whether the power of propulsion is transmitted thereto from an external or internal source and includes a chassis to which a body has not been attached and a trailer ; but does not include a vehicle running upon fixed rails or a vehicle of a special type adapted for use only in -d factor or in any other enclosed premises." Chapter If contains various provisions relating to licencing of drivers of motor vehicles. Section 3, sub-section 1), provides that "no person shall drive a motor vehicle in any public place unless he holds an effective driving licence issued to himself authorising him to drive the vehicle ; and no person shall so drive a motor vehicle as paid employee or shall so drive transport vehicle unless his driving licence specifically entitles him so to do. "Sub-section (2) provides that "A State Government may prescribe the conditions subject to which sub-section (1) shall not apply to a person receiving instruction m driving a motor vehicle". Sections 4 to 17-B make various provisions concerning driving licences. Section 21, sub-section (1), confers power on the State Government to make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of Chapter II. Sub-section (2) enacts that without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide, inter alia, for "the issue of temporary licences to persons receiving instruction in driving". Chapter VIII containing sections 93 to 111-A makes provision, inter alia% for insurance of motor vehicles against third party risks. Under section 94, sub-section (1), no person shall use (except as a passenger) or cause or allow any other person to use a motor vehicle in a public place, unless there is in force in relation to the use of the vehicle a policy of insurance complying with the requirements of the Chapter, hereinafter to be referred to as "the statutory policy" for the sake of convenience. Section 95 prescribes the requirements of the statutory policy and the limits of liability. One of the liabilities which is required to be covered by












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top