KAMLESH SHARMA
SURINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
HIMACHAL GRAMIN BANK – Respondent
Kamlesh Sharma, J.—The petitioners who are Clerks in Himachal Gramin Bank have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer that promotion of respondents No. 2 to 16 to the post of Field Supervisor may be set -aside and Himachal Gramin Bank may be directed to make fresh promotions in accordance with law. Respondents No. 2 to 16 were promoted on 26-0-1987 in pursuance to the selection made by the Departmental Promotion Committee on 6-2-1987.
2. The petitioners as well as respondents No. 2 to 16 were appointed as Clerks by direct recruitment from July, 1979 to November, 1980. Admittedly, in the cadre of Clerks, petitioners No, 1 and 2 are senior to respondents No. 2 to 10 and respondents No. 15 and 16, and petitioners No. 3 to 7 are senior to respondents No 2 to 10 Respondents No. 11 to 14 are senior to the petitioners. This has been stated on the basis of Annexure R-A filed by the Himachal Gramin Bank with its reply affidavit. Annexure R-A is a list of Clerks who completed six years of service on or before 31-12-1986 wherein the petitioners as well as the respondents have been placed according to their date of appointment.
3. The Him
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.