SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(HP) 108

KAMLESH SHARMA
BARU RAM – Appellant
Versus
KISHANI DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the appellant(s) :Sh. K. D. Scod, Advocate. For the respondent(s):Pt. Om Parkash, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Kamlesh Sharma, J.—In this Regular Second Appeal at the instance of the appellants-defendants, Baru Ram and three others, the decree and judgment dated 2-3-1991 passed by the Additional District Judge (I), Kangra at Dharamshala, is under challenge whereby the appeal of respondent-plaintiff, Smt. Kishani Devi, was accepted and the decree and judgment dated 17-1-1986 of sub-Judge 1st Class Dehra, District Kangra, was set-aside. By the impugned decree and judgment, the suit of Smt. Kishani Devi has been decreed.

2. Smt Kishani Devi had filed civil suit for declaration that the will alleged to have been executed by her husband, Sh. Balandu, in favour of S/Sh. Baru Ram and others was illegal and void and had no effect on her rights of inheritance. She further prayed for decree and declaration that she was owner in possession of the estate of her husband, Sh. Balandu, and S/Sh. Baru Ram and others may be restrained from interfering in her possession. S/Sh Baru Ram and others resisted this suit and took a number of preliminary objection. On merits, they alleged that the will executed in their favour by Sh. Balandu, who was their brother, was valid will. They claimed that Sh. Balan





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top