S S Sidhu, I.A.S —.Shri Hem Raj and others have challenged the order dated 13-1-1988 of the Commissioner, Mandi Division, through this appeal.

2. The facts of the case briefly stated are that Shri Pawan Kumar, respondent preferred an application for correction of Khasra Girdwari entries in respect of land comprised in Khasra No 89/1, measuring 355 80 Sq meters, situated in Muhal Purani Mandi, before the Assistant Collector, II Grade, Mandi, on the ground that he was in cultivating possession of the land under the present appellants on payment of rent at the rate of Rs. 20 per annum. When the case had been fixed for the evidence of the parties by the Assistant Collector, II Grade, an appeal was filed by the present appellants before the Sub-Divisional Collector, Mandi. stating that the Assistant Collector below had wrongly proceeded to correct the entries of Jamabandi. The learned Sub-Divisional Collector, Mandi, after hearing the parties, accepted the appeal vide his order dated 17-12-1987 on the ground that the entries already existing in the revenue record could not be corrected Shri Pawaa Kumar, present respondent filed an appeal against this order before the Divisional