SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(HP) 143

KAMLESH SHARMA
VIKRAM ANAND – Appellant
Versus
RAKESH SINGHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
In E. P. No. 1 o/1994 :For the petitioner:M/s. K. D. Sood and M. C. Mandhotra, Advocates. For the respondents:Sh. Jagdish Vats, Advocate, for respondent No. i. Shri R. K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. Nemo for other respondents. In E. P. No. 5 of 1994:For the petitioner:Sh. R. K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents:M/s. Vikash Bhattacharya, Jagdish Vats and Y. S. Dhaulta, Advocates, for respondent No. 1. Sh. M. C. Mandhotra, Advocate, for respondent No, 2. Nemo for other respondents. In E. P. No. 4 of 1994:For the petitioner(s):M/s. K. D. Sood, A. K. Goel and M. C. Mandhotra, Advocates. For the respondent(s):M/s. Vikash Bhattacharya, Jagdish Vats and Y. S. Dhaulta, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Kamlesh Sharma, J.—-These three Election Petitions (Election Petition No. 4 of 1994, Vikram Anand v. Rakesh Singha, 5 of 1994, Suresh Bhardwaj v. Rakesh Singha and others and 1 of 1994, Harbhajan Singh Bhajji v. Rakesh Singha and others) are being disposed of by a common judgment as the relief sought for in them is common. It is to declare the election of Sh. Rakesh Singha, from 8th Shimla Assembly Constituency held in November 1993, void. Election Petition No. 4 of 1994, which has been filed by an Elector, Sh. Vikram Anand, is on the grounds that the result of the election of Sh. Rakesh Singha has been materially effected by the improper acceptance, of his nomination papers as he was disqualified to be chosen to fill the seat of 8th Assembly Constituency having been convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than two years as provided under section 8 (3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter called the Act).

2. In Election Petition No. 5 of 1994, which has been filed by a defeated candidate, Sh. Suresh Bhardwaj, who had contested the election on the ticket of Bhartiya Janta Party, besides the grounds taken in Election Petition No. 4 of 1994,












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top