SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(HP) 123

KAMLESH SHARMA
SUNDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DES RAJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioner:Sandeep Kaushik, Advocate. For the respondent:Baldev Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kamlesh Sharma, J.—The petitioner-plaintiff is aggrieved by the order dated 5-12-1996, passed by Sub-Judge, Rajgarh, District Sirmaur, whereby his application under Order 6, Rule 17, C« P. C. for amendment of the plaint was dismissed.

2. The brief facts are that petitioner-plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining the respondent-defendant from making any interference in his suit property, consisting of land measuring 8 biswas, comprised in Khasra No 613/489 situated in Mauza Rajgarh, Pargana Giripar, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Sirmaur and the building constructed thereon by projecting the construction of the first and second floor of his building towards the suit property and also by causing any type of damage to the stairs thereon It was admitted in the plaint that the respondent-defendant is owner of the adjoining land comparised in Khasra No 611/ 489 and 612/489 over which he has raised construction by covering his entire land. But the precise allegations were that the respondent-defendant has no right to make any encroachment on the building of petitioner-plaintiff by way of projecting the construction of first and second floor of his building and to c







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top