SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(HP) 83

A.K.GOEL
ASHOK KUMAR THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
COL. SURINDER SINGH GROVER (RETD. ) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the appellant(s) :Shri K. D Sood, Advocate. For the respondents:Shri Ajay Kumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Arun Kumar Goel, J.—Appellant (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) has filed this appeal against the judgment and decree passed by Mrs Aruna Kapoor, Additional District Judge (i), Shimla in civil appeal No I2S/i3of 1992 dated 18-9-1993. By means of impugued judgment and decree, the First Appellate Court has upheld the decree for possession as well as for recovery of Rs 2,200 besides mesne profits ordered under the decree of the trial Court dated 12-12-1991.

2. Brief facts giving rise to this case are that a suit for possession as well as for recovery of money by the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) against the defendant. This suit was based on title. Plaintiff claimed himself to be the owner of the property comprised in Khasra No. 6/1, measuring 2 biswas, together with a structure measuring 45x 10 standing on this land. Case of the plaintiff further was that he had purchased the said two biswas of land from its previous owner Smt Begmu by means of a registered sale deed Ex P-l and the property was situated in Mauza Jungle Mashobra, Tehsil and District Shimla. This sale deed Ex P-l was on 29-11 1985 registered in the office of Sub-Registrar, Shimla



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top