M.SRINIVASAN, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
SATISH KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
BAR COUNCIL OF H. P. – Respondent
M. Srinivasan, C.J.- The petitioner after passing LLB. in 1975-76 got appointed as Assistant (Legal) by the H.P State Electricity Board (here-in-after referred to as “the Board"), The post was re-designated as Taw-Officer Grade-II’ in 1978, By office order dated 6-9-1983 the Board allowed him to act as an Advocate of the Board and also ordered that the expenditure on account of his getting a licence from the Bar Council shall be borne by the Board, His application for enrolment was forwarded by the Secretary of the Board to the respondent on 13-10-1983. By a letter dated 28-3-1994 the Secretary of the respondent informed the Secretary of the Board that the office order dated 6-9-1983 of the Board did not meet the requirements of the Rules and that he should first be designated as a Law Officer. The addressee was also requested to send the order of appointment and the terms of such appointment. On 11-6-1984 the Board passed an office order modifying the earlier order dated 6-9-1983 and declared the petitioner as Law Officer of the Board Thereafter on 5-7-1984 another office order was passed whereby the designation of the post of Law Officer Grade II was changed as Law Offic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.