SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(HP) 39

KAMLESH SHARMA
VADIA BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
SARDAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr B.K. Malhotra, Advocate, for the Petitioner Mr M.A. Khan, Advocate, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

MS. KAMLESH SHARMA, ACJ.—Admit. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally and disposed of in the following terms :—

2. Petitioner Vadia Banerjee is sister, whereas, respondent Sardar is widow of late Pyare Lai, who died on 27.3.1992. His ordinary residence at the time of his death was Ward No. 5, Kangra, Tehsil and District Kangra. He had left behind a sum of Rs. 70,000/- invested in FDR No. AF/P/759209/ 524KY/90-91 of UCO Bank Branch Birta 1023, Tehsil and District Kangra and Rs. 3726.55 deposited in his Savings Bank Account No. 9148 of Punjab National Bank, Nagrota Bagwan, Tehsil and District Kangra. On the basis of a will dated 15.6.1991 executed by late Pyare Lal in her favour, Vadia Banerjee filed petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter called the Act) for granting her succession certificate of the amounts lying in the said FDR and Savings Bank Account.

3. Respondent Sardar objected to the petition on merits besides raising preliminary objections. According to her, her husband late Pyare Lai had not executed any legal and valid will in favour of his sister Vadia Banerjee and it is only she who











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top