SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(HP) 21

P.K.PALLI
MITAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
ASHISH KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kuldip Singh, Advocate for the petitioners; Ravi Bakshi, Advocate, for Respondent No. 3.

JUDGMENT

P.K. PALLI, J.—All these Miscellaneous Petitions (CMPs. (M) No. 669 to 672 of 1997) are proposed to be disposed of by a common order. All these petitions are directed against the award given by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nahan dated September 15, 1997.

2. The facts and the accident are not disputed. On analysis, the Tribunal has awarded an amount of less than Rs. 10,000 in each of these petitions on account of compensation for the injuries sustained by the applicants/claimants in the course of the accident. Liability has been fastened on Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, i.e. the owner as well as the driver of the offending bus, jointly and severally. Admittedly, the remedy of statutory appeal is barred when the amount of compensation is less than Rs. 10,000/

3. It is in this manner that challenge to the award has been made by the petitioner by way of petitions filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India. Shri Kuldip Singh has referred to the covernote Ext. R-1, letter dated November 14, 1996 Ext. R-2, Draft dated November 23, 1996 Ext. R-6, letter dated November 26, 1996 Ext. R-8 and it is being urged that these documents h













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top