K.C.SOOD, C.K.THAKKER
ROHIT SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
H. P. UNIVERSITY – Respondent
Kuldip Chand Sood, J.—We propose to dispose of these two writ petitions by this judgment as the questions involved in both the writ petitions are same and arise out of similar action of the respondent H.P. University (University for short).
2. For the purpose of disposal of these writ petitions, facts from Rohit Sharmas petition may be noticed:
3. The respondent-University advertised and published a Brochure "Hand Book of Information" for admissions to the Course of B.Ed, for the Session 2000-2001. The application forms were to be submitted on or before April 17, 2000. The entrance test was to be held on May 28, 2000. The results were to be declared on July 1, 2000. The counseling, according to the Brochure, was to take place from July 15, 2000 to July 19, 2000. The case of the petitioner(s) is :
4. Applications for admission to the B.Ed. Course were invited from the candidates who had passed their graduation with 45% marks or above (in case of candidates from Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe categories, 40% or above). The academic eligibility for candidates from non-medical category was B.Sc. pass course with physics, Chemistry and Mathematics OR B.Sc. Honours in Physics with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.