R.L.KHURANA, M.R.VERMA
RAMESH CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Respondent
M.R. Verma, J.—This appeal has been preferred by the accused convict against his conviction and sentence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. He is accused of pouring kerosine oil on one Smt. Bholi Devi and setting her ablaze on 17.5.1999 as a consequence where of she died on 18.5.1999. The defence of the accused is that Sidhu alias Mohinder, husband of the deceased, is a notorious criminal and deals in the distillation and sale of illicit liquor and the police officials of Police Post, Nagrota Sudan, where the report was lodged, are helping Sidhu in his work of illicit distillation whereas the accused had been objected to it. Therefore, he has been falsely implicated in the case.
2. During the course of hearing of this appeal when the learned Counsel for the appellant was reading statement of Head Constable Parma Nand (PW-15), who partially investigated the case, a doubt arose about the correct recording of the English version of his statement to the following effect: "It is incorrect to suggest that I am also getting HAFTA from PW Mohinder Singh. It is incorrect that the case which I investigated against him in connection with illicit liquor were framed against him
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.