SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(HP) 238

DEEPAK GUPTA
BALDEV RAJ – Appellant
Versus
BIMLA SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajnish Maniktala, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. K.D. Batish, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Deepak Gupta, J.—This appeal has been filed by the husband under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Kangra at Dharamsala in Hindu Marriage Petition No. 3/D/III/ 93, decided on 21.6.1996 dismissing the petition of the husband.

2. The husband filed a petition under Section 9 of the Act for restitution of conjugal rights or in the alternative for grant of a decree of divorce under Section 13 of the Act. The facts, as alleged, were that the marriage between the parties was solemnized according to Hindu rights at Talwara on 7.8.1988. It was alleged that about 7 months after the marriage, the respondent left her matrimonial home. After the intervention of some respectable persons she again joined company of the petitioner in May, 1989, but again left his company after one week. According to the petitioner he also sought the help of Family Counseling Center, but with no fruitful result. Thereafter at the instance of some other persons including the brother of the wife, she again joined company of the petitioner, but finally deserted the husband and left for Talwara





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top