SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(HP) 150

K.C.SOOD
MANBHARI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the Bail:Petitioners Mr. R.M. Bisht, Asstt. A.G. for the state.

JUDGMENT

: Kuldip Chand Sood, J. : - All these 13 applications under section 438 of the code of criminal Procedure are being disposed of by this common order as all of them arise from a case FIR No.257/2Kforthe offences punishable under Sections 20/ 27-A/29/32 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, (hereinafter referred to as the Drugs Act) registered with the Police Station, Kullu, on 1.6.2000. The applicants are resident of Village Tosh, P.O. Barshiani, Tehsil and District Kullu (H.P).

2. In order to appreciate the respective contentions of the applicants and prosecution, the facts as disclosed in the First information Report may be noticed in brief:

3. On the early morning of 1st June, 2000, ASI Kanwar Singh, Incharge, Police Manikaran, received a secret information that Datti Ram s/o Alam Chand r/o Village Tosh deals in the sale of Charas at large scale and on immediate raid charas can be recovered from his house. ASI Kanwar Singh reduced the information received by him in writing, constituted a raiding party including therein local Vice President of the Panchayat Khushal Chand and Numberdar Tej Ram. A copy of the information so recorded was sent to Dy. S.P. H








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top