OMP No. 450 of 2004. Heard learned Counsel for he parties present

2. When OMP No. 450 of 2004 came up for consideration on 17.9.2004, this Court after having gone through the plaint and documents attached with it was satisfied that it was a fit case for passing an exparte ad-interim order. Accordingly, following exparte order was passed: "Accordingly subject to completion of pleadings in the main suit as well as in this application, and the defendants being heard m this OMP, by way or exparte ad-interim order it is ordered that defendants shall not in any manner cause any sort of obstruction m the miming of the hotel business by the plaintiffs, they will also not cause arty obstruct on to the ingress and egress either from the main entrance or from the rear entrance of the hotel in question, either themselves or through other members of the Union of which respondent No.9 m the Secretary. At the same time, defendants are also restrained and prohibited from m any manner causing damage to the property of the plaintiff and/or removing anything from hotel. They are further restrained from holding any demonstration or slogan shouting within the radius of 500 metres from the plai