SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(HP) 146

KAMLESH SHARMA, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
MADHU SOOD – Appellant
Versus
ANIL KUMAR SOOD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M/s. Bhupinder Gupta and Mr. Prannet Gupta, Advocates. For the Respondent:Mr. K.D.Sood, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.: This is wifes appeal against the decree of judicial separation under Section 13-A of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) dated 3.7.1996 of Addl. District Judge (I), Kangra at Dharmshala passed in H.M.P No. 35-D/94 in favour of Anil Kumar Sood and against Smt. Madhu Sood appellant Anil Sood has also assailed the decree by way of cross objections. We hare taken and heard the appeal and cross-objections together as these arise out of common decree For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as husband and wife herein. . .

2. Briefly the facts are that Anil Kumar Sood got married with Smt. Madhu Sood on 10.5.1990 according to Hindu rites at Hitwas, Tebsil and District Kangra. They lived together and cohabited at Dohra for a short duration. A fern ale child was born to the parties in April, 1991 who is living under the care and custody of the wife. The husband filed petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act on 12.1.1994 against his wife for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce. It was averred in the petition that after the marriage wife stayed with the husband initially only about 22 days Du


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top