SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(HP) 111

M.R.VERMA
STATE OF H. P. – Appellant
Versus
SHAMSHER SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. M.S.Guleria, Deputy Advocate General. For the Respondents:Mr. Jagdish Vats, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

M. R. Verma, J.: This is an appeal against the judgment dated 22.4.1993 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kullu whereby the accused-respondents (hereinafter referred to as "the accused") have been acquitted of the accusations under Sees. 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 30.03.1991 when AS1 Harbhajan Singh alongwith Range Officer, Hurla and few other police and forest officials were on patrol duty at Bhuntar, a secret information was received that truck No. HIE 1316 was illegally transporting sleepers from Sarsari side. The said truck was intercepted and on checking it was found carrying 15 deodar sleepers of the size of 10 x 10" x 5" without any permit nor the sleepers were hammer marked. A case was, therefore, registered against the accused under Secs. 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act on the basis of ruqua Ex. PW-2/A prepared and sent by ASI Harbhajan Singh at Police Station, Kullu vide FIR Ex.PW-2/B. On completion of investigation and on being satisfied about the alleged commission of the offence by the accused, the officer-incharge. Police Station, Kullu submitted a charge-sheet against the accused, who











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top