SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(HP) 255

M.R.VERMA
SANTOSH – Appellant
Versus
BHAGAT CHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. N.D. Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent:Mr. B. C. Negi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

M. R. Verma, J.: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 16.1.1999 passed by the learned Sub Judge, Rohru, whereby an application moved by the petitioner-plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, under Order 18 Rule 2(4), 18 and 17-A read with Section 151 C.P.C. for leading f additional evidence has been dismissed.

2. The un-disputed facts are the plaintiff has instituted a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the respondents- defendants (hereinafter referred to as defendants) through family members, labourers, parents, servants, contractor etc. from interfering in the possession of the plaintiff over the land, khasra No. 576/1, measuring 270 square meters, situate in Chak Nagar Panchayat Rohru, District Shimla (hereinafter referred to as the suit land). The suit land was jointly purchased by plaintiff and defendant No. 1, Bhagat Chand in equal shares in the year 1988. Hereinafter facts as averred by the plaintiff are disputed by the defendants. Further case of the plaintiff is that the suit land had been partitioned between the plaintiff and defendants and he got the land towards the forest colony and the land towards D.D. Ghar










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top