SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(HP) 66

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh
KAMLESH SHARMA,K.C.SOOD
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Appellant
Versus
R.K.SINGHA - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 114 of 1993
Decided On : 03/31/2000

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Mr. Vivek Thakur, Asstt. Advocte General; For the Respondents:Mr. C.B. Singh Advocate (for R. No. 1) Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate with Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for No. 2.

Headnote:INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 - Sections 409, 420 and 120-B - Prevention of corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2) - Acquittal- Appeal - Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Sections 62 and 64 - Primary evidence Section 64 mandates that all documents must be proved by primary evidence except where party has been permitted to lead secondary evidence - Section 62 defines primary evidence to mean the document itself produced for inspection of Court - Entire case of prosecution rely on the evidence of Agriculture Inspector-In-Charge of the Scheme - Does not say a word in his evidence as to why he made advance entry not only on the reverse of the bills, which may be to facilitate the payment but also in store register - Payment were passed only on the certificate of In-charge of the Scheme - He is not that innocent as he would have us believe - His testimony being un-worthy of any credence cannot be relied upon - There is no other evidence to link the accused with commission of any offence - Appeal against acquittal, dismissed.

JUDGMENT

(Kuldip Chand Sood, J.): This appeal, by the State, is directed against the judgment of learned Special Judge (II), Sirmour District at Nahan, acquitting accused-respondents, R.K. Singha, Lekhbir Singh and Harbinder Singh, here-in-after referred to as A-l, A-2 and A-3 respectively. Accused Al and A2 were tried for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (here-in- after referred to as the Corruption Act)-Accused A3 was tried for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. All the three accused have been acquitted, by the learned Special Judge (II), Sirmour District at Nahan, for want of adequate evidence.

2. It may be pertinent to notice here that during the pendency of the appeal A3 died and appeal in so far A-3 is concerned stands abated.

3. Prosecution case in brief: Al was posted as Assistant Soil Conservation Officer, Panota Sahib in the year 1990, A2 was Agriculture Inspector working under A1 at the relevant time and A3 was proprietor of Firm M/s Public Iron Store at Yamuna Nagar in the District of Ambala. It appears that Government approved certain schemes I for Community Irrigation and Soil Conservations, in Nahan Block for Villages Jamly, Jarja, Khairwala and Burma Papri. For this purpose, about 1400 meters of G.I. Pipes and 1395 K.Gs of G.I. wire was to be purchased. A1 was directed by the authorities to purchase these items. On 26.3.1980 Al and A2 went to / Yamuna Nagar for this purpose. They obtained quotations from various firms and inspected the quality of the items to be purchased. A Bill No. 2848 dated 26.3.1980 (Ext.PWl/B) amounting to Rs. 21126.81 paise, Bill No. 2849 (Ext.PWl/C), amounting to Rs. 19474.00, Bill No. 2852 (Ext.PWl/D), amounting to Rs. 3681.60 paise, Bill No. 2853 (Ext.PWl/E) amounting to Rs. 2652.00 and Bill No. 2854 (Ext.PWl/F) amounting to Rs. 5491.20 paise all dated 27.3.1980 were obtained by A2 in respect of the material purchased for the schemes. The payment of all these bills amounting to Rs. 52425.61 paise was made, by two Bank Drafts one dated 28.3.1980 in the amount of Rs. 40600.80 piase and the other also of the even date in the amount of Rs. 11824.80 paise to M/s Public Iron Store, Yamuna Nagar. It is further case of the prosecution that Sh. Jitender Kumar Verma, Agriculture Inspector (PW-13), who was looking after these Schemes, was summoned by A-1 and asked to make necessary entries in respect of the goods of these bills in the Stock Register. PW-13 accordingly made entries regarding the receipt of the goods of in the Stock Register. He also scribed a note on the Stock Register that these were the only advance entries and material, in respect of these bills, has not been received. He also made entry to similar effect on the reverse of the each bill. The bank drafts were sent to the Firm on 29.3.1980. A GR No. 534 from regular Goods Transport Company, Yamuna Nagar was obtained by A2 showing that these goods were carried under this particular G.R. A-2 also received Rs. 534/- being freight charges of the goods under G.R. No. 534, On investigation, it was found that material worth Rs. 12988/- was only received against the material of Rs. j 52425.61 paise. The remaining amount of Rs. 39437.61 paise, according to the prosecution, was misappropriated by the accused persons in pursuance to the conspiracy. It is in this background that the accused have; been prosecuted.

4. Learned trial Judge, as noticed earlier, acquitted all the accused for want of adequate evidence.

5. We have heard learned Assistant Advocate General, for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents. We have also gone through the record.

6. It is admitted position that A-l and A-2 were public servants at the relevant time. Sub-section (2) of Section 13 of the Corruption Act is a punitive provision and provide(s) for the punishment to any public servant who commits criminal


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top