KAMLESH SHARMA
GURCHARAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDER VERMA – Respondent
Kamlesh Sharma, J-: The petitioners are the defendants, whereas, the respondent is the plaintiff and they will be referred as such in this judgment. The defendants are aggrieved by the decree and judgment dated 8.1.1998 passed by Sub Judge 1st class (I), Sirrnaur District at Paonta Sahib whereby the suit of the plaintiff is decreed for recovery of possession of the shop in dispute i.e. shop owned by defendants near Bangran Chowk in House No. 80, Ward No.7 as shown in site plan Mark D. As provided under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (hereinafter called the Act) no appeal lies against the impugned decree and judgment passed under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Act, the defendants have filed the present revision petition under Section 115C.P.C.
2. The plaintiff had filed civil suit under Section 6 of the Act against the defendants on the allegations that he was induced as tenant in the shop in dispute in the month of March, 1992 on a rent of Rs.500/- per month which was increased to Rs.600/- per month in July, 1994. According to the plaintiff, when he was forcibly dispossessed from the shop in dispute on 29.3.1997 by the defendants, he repor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.