SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(HP) 406

R.L.KHURANA
SHAM LAL – Appellant
Versus
MATHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Mr. T.R. Chandel, Advocate with Mr. Ashok Sood, Advocate. For the Respondent:Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT R.L. Khurana, J. :- The appellant before this Court is the defendant. He is aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 22.9.1994 of the learned District Judge, Shimla, affirming the judgment and decree dated 6.3.1990 of the learned Sub Judge 1st class (4), Shimla.

2. The subject matter of the dispute between the parties comprises of a two storeyed house and a single storeyed kitchen located in the land measuring 3 biswas comprising in khasra No.369, khewat No.3 and khatauni No.4 in village Chhakrail, Pargana Majhola, Tehsil and District Shimla, hereinafter referred to as the property in dispute.

3. Smt. Mathi and Smt. Sunehroo daughter of Parsu, claiming themselves to be the owners of the property in dispute on the allegations that the defendant was coming in possession thereof since 1968 without any right, title or interest therein. They also claimed mesne profits/damages/compensation amounting to Rs.500/- for the use and occupation of the property in dispute by the defendant at the rate of Rs. 15/- per month.

4. The defendant while resisting the suit asserted that he was coming in possession of the property in dispute under an agreement dated 14.8.1965 that previously also































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top