SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(HP) 368

M.R.VERMA
JAGDISH – Appellant
Versus
RAM KARAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent:Mr. G.D. Verma, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT M.R. Verma, J.(Oral) :- This is a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereafter referred to as the Code) preferred by the appellant-defendant (hereafter referred to as the appellant) against the judgment and decree dated 14.3.2001 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Solan, whereby he has dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 29.8.2000 passed by the learned Sub Judge 1st Class, Nalagarh, in Civil Suit No.60/1 of 1998.

2. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant moved an application under Order 22 Rules 4 and 9 read with Section 151 of the Code for bringing on record the legal representatives of respondent No6 along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the said application. The respondents were afforded an opportunity to file reply to the application which they did not. What emerges from the uncontroversial averments in the aforesaid applications, duly supported by affidavits and Annexure A-1, is that Babu Ram, respondent No.6, died on 1.1.2001, when the first appeal preferred by the appellant against the judgment and









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top