JUDGMENT Kamlesh Sharma, J. :- The petitioner-insurance company is respondent No.3 in the claim petition filed by respondent No.l - claimant Jaswant Singh which is pending before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Shimla. Respondents No.7 and 3 are respondents 1 and 2 in the claim petition being owner and driver of the vehicle in question. One Rameshwar Singh son of Kanwar Singh, who is respondent No.4 in the claim petition, is another owner of the vehicle, but inadvertently he has not been impleaded as party respondent in this revision petition. This defect was not pointed out at the time of hearing of the revision petition. However, it,is not material as owner Jaswant Singh and driver Kanwar Singh are impleaded as respondents in the revision petition.

2. The petitioner insurance company is aggrieved by the later part of the order dated 11.4.2001 whereby its evidence was closed and the statement of Shri K.S. Raina. its Assistant Administrative Officer, who was present with a true copy of the insurance policy was not recorded on the ground that it was intended to be produced at a belated stage having been not filed at the time of or after the settlement of issues and without showin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document