2002 Supreme(HP) 126
W.A.SHISHAK, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
JAGPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H. P. – Respondent
Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: :Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate. For the Respondents: :Mr. R.M. Bisht, Assistance Advocate General, for Nos. 1 & 2, Mr. S.S. Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate for No. 3 and Mr. Dushyant Dadhwal, Advocate for Nos. 4 to 8.
JUDGMENT Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J- This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs: (a) The respondents may be directed to produce the record before the Honble Court; (b) The impugned criteria prescribed/laid down by the respondents in the Prospectus for Entrance Test for Post-Graduate Degree and Diploma Courses in Session 2001-2002/2004 whereby the doctors working on contract/ad hoc basis have been rendered and are being treated as ineligible for selection against in service quota seats may| kindly be declared unconstitutional and struck down; (c) The impugned action and decision of the respondents in not forwarding and rather turning down the petitioners application for appearing in the said Entrance Test under the category of in-service doctors may kindly be declared illegal, ultra vires and unconstitutional and may be quashed and set aside; (d) The respondents may kindly be directed to treat the petitioner as eligible for appearing in the forthcoming Entrance Test for post Graduate Degree/Diploma Course in respect of in-service quota seats and in case the petitioner is found suitable and selected in the sai
Click Here to Read the rest of this document