SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(HP) 291

V.K.GUPTA
SURESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
RAJPAL THAKUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate; For the Respondent:Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT V.K. Gupta, CJ. (Oral): Vide the impugned order dated 11th May, 2004, the learned Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) (Court No. 3), Shimla has struck off the defence of the petitioner-defendant by exercising its power/jurisdiction in terms of Order 8 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure since, as per the contents of the impugned order, the petitioner-defendant having been served with the summons for appearance on 14th January, 2004, he filed the written statement on 23rd April, 2004, i.e. beyond the period of 90 days, as prescribed in Order 8 Rule 1, Order 8 Rule 1 reads as under :- "1. Written statement. - The defendant shall, within thirty days from the date of service of summons on him, present a written statement of his defense: Provided that where the defendant fails to file the written statement within the said period of thirty days, he shall be allowed to file the same on such other day, as may be specified by the Court, for reasons to be recorded in writing, but which shall not be later than ninety days from the date of service of summons."

2. Rule 10 of Order 8 clearly stipulates that where any party from whom a written statement is required in terms of Rule 1






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top