V.M.JAIN
PRITHI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BAKSHI RAM – Respondent
V. M. Jain, J.: This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the plaintiff-petitioner against the order dated 17.8.2005 passed by the trial Court, dismissing the application of the plaintiff under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC for appointment of a Local Commissioner.
2. The facts which are relevant for the decision of the present petition are that Prithi Singh plaintiff had filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction claiming himself to be the owner in possession of the suit land and alleging therein that the defendants were total strangers and had no right to raise any construction etc. thereon and as such the defendants be restrained from raising any construction etc. over the suit land. In the alternative, it was prayed that in case the defendants succeed in raising construction over the suit property or occupying any portion thereof, then a decree for possession by way of demolition of such construction be passed. The suit was contested by the defendants alleging that the defendants had no concern with the land of the plaintiff. It was alleged that in fact the suit land and the land of the defendants adjoined each other and there was an old
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.