S.S.NEGI, M.R.VERMA
SAVITRI CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H. P. – Respondent
M.R. Verma, Justice (Retd.) Chairman. In this original application the appellant has inter alia claimed the following reliefs: "(1) That the respondents may be directed to regularize the applicant as a Clerk who effect from 1.4.1982 and alternatively with effect from 8.5.1985 with all consequential benefits. (ii) That the respondents may be directed to give to the applicant the arrears of salary due and permissible to her on account of relief at (1) above"
2. The case of the applicant as made out in the original application is that she possessed the requisite qualification and was given employment as a daily waged Clerk w. e. f. 1.4.1982 when the joined her duties as such. The employment of the applicant was extended from time to time and her experience certificate as having worked as a Clerk w. e. f. 1.4.1982 to 12.5.1985 is Annexure A-8. She bonafide believes that her case was recommended for regularisation but vide order dated May 8, 1985 (wrongly mentioned as 1995 in sub para 3 of para 6 of the original application) Annexure A-9 her services were ordered to be regularised as a Peon. She objected such appointment but on assurance by the S.D.O.(Civil) she accepted the app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.