DEEPAK GUPTA
PURAN OUTT – Appellant
Versus
H. R. T. C. – Respondent
Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral).: This is an appeal by the Workman under Section 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act. The appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law:-
1. Whether the learned Commissioner is right in assessing the compensation by taking disability at 30% despite holding that the loss earning capacity is to the extent of 100% by misconstruing the provisions of Section 4 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923?
2. Whether the learned Commissioner is right in not awarding 50% penalty as envisaged under Section 4-A of the Workmens Compensation Act?
3. Whether the learned Commissioner is right in not taking into consideration the law laid down by this Honble Court titled-H.P. State Forest Corporation vs. Sees Ram reported in 2000 (1) SLJ 709?
4. Whether the learned Commissioner erred law in ordering the deduction of ex-gratia payment?
2. The brief facts necessary for the decision of the case are that appellant-Puran Dutt was working as a driving in the H.R.T.C. on 29.9.1999 the claimant was on duty with bus No. HP-07-2099 which met with an accident The claimant suffered serious injuries in the accident and his right leg was crushed. He was taken to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.