SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(HP) 458

DEEPAK GUPTA
PURAN OUTT – Appellant
Versus
H. R. T. C. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent

JUDGEMENT

Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral).: This is an appeal by the Workman under Section 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act. The appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law:-

1. Whether the learned Commissioner is right in assessing the compensation by taking disability at 30% despite holding that the loss earning capacity is to the extent of 100% by misconstruing the provisions of Section 4 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923?

2. Whether the learned Commissioner is right in not awarding 50% penalty as envisaged under Section 4-A of the Workmens Compensation Act?

3. Whether the learned Commissioner is right in not taking into consideration the law laid down by this Honble Court titled-H.P. State Forest Corporation vs. Sees Ram reported in 2000 (1) SLJ 709?

4. Whether the learned Commissioner erred law in ordering the deduction of ex-gratia payment?

2. The brief facts necessary for the decision of the case are that appellant-Puran Dutt was working as a driving in the H.R.T.C. on 29.9.1999 the claimant was on duty with bus No. HP-07-2099 which met with an accident The claimant suffered serious injuries in the accident and his right leg was crushed. He was taken to













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top