SURJIT SINGH
MAHINDRA & COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H. P. – Respondent
Surjit Singh, Judge: There had been some agreement between Mahindra & Company, hereinafter referred to as decree holder, and the State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Forest), whereby Maple Shuttle Blocks were agreed to be supplied by the State of Himachal Pradesh and other judgment debtors to the decree holder. It appears that the judgment debtors did not supply the entire agreed quantity of the Shuttle Blocks. The matter was referred to the Arbitrator in terms of the agreement. The Arbitrator gave an award that the decree holder was entitled to the supply of 109.803 cubic meters of Maple Shuttle Blocks. The award was submitted to this Court and was made rule of Court by this Court, vide decree dated 18.6.1984 and it was ordered that 109.803 cubic meters Maple. Shuttle Blocks would be supplied to the decree holder by the judgment debtors within one year. On the asking of the judgment debtors, the period was extended twice, initially by one year and then up to 31.12.1986. The judgment debtors supplied only 11.427 cubic meters of Maple Shuttle Blocks out of 109.803 cubic meters. On 22.12.1989 the present execution petition was filed by the decree holder.
2. The judgm
T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad etc. vs. Union of India and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.