SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(HP) 346

KULDIP SINGH
DEVKI NAND – Appellant
Versus
JAI KISHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Kuldip Singh, J.—This appeal is against the judgment dated 7.7.2001 passed by learned District Judge, Kinnaur Civil Division at Rampur Bushahr in Civil Appeal No. 8 of 2001.

2. The brief facts are that Jai Kishan plaintiff filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Devki Nand defendant, restraining him from interfering in any manner in the use of path by plaintiff which passes through khasra Nos. 17, 49/1, 50/1 and 51/1. The suit was contested by defendant and was dismissed by learned Sub Judge 1st Class Rampur Bushahr on 14.3.2001. The plaintiff filed an appeal against judgment, decree dated 14.3.2001 and in the appeal plaintiff filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC for amendment of plaint. The plaintiff wanted to plead more facts in para-1 of the plaint and he wanted to add paras 1-A and 2-A also in the plaint. This application was opposed by defendant. The learned District Judge allowed the amendment application on 7.7.2001 and remanded the suit to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law. The defendant is in appeal in this Court against judgment dated 7.7.2001.

3. The learned Counsel for the appellant has submitted









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top