SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(HP) 37

P.D.DESAI, H.S.THAKUR
RADHA SOAMI SATSANG BEAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K. Khanna, for Petitioner; P.N. Nag, Advocate General, for Respondents.

JUDGEMENT

P. D. Desai, C.J.:-Rule. To be heard to-day. 2. The learned Advocate General waives service of the Rule on behalf of the respondents.

3. The petitioner is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (Act No. 21 of 1860). The petitioner claims to be the owner in possession of three buildings along with the land appurtenant thereto situate in a locality known as Moti Tibba in the town of Dalhousie which falls within the revenue limits of District Chamba. Adjacent to the said property is situate a property belonging to the State Government (first respondent) in which a Government High School is being run since long. In or about Sept. 1981, the petitioner as well as the school authorities made an application to the competent authority under S.107, sub-sec.(1) of the Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for defining the limits or boundaries between the property owned by the petitioner and that owned by the first respondent. The competent authority demarcated the boundaries on Oct. 19, 1981 in the presence of the representatives of the parties as per the copy of the proceedings produced at Annexure-B. The demarcation

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top