SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(HP) 47

T.U.MEHTA
NANDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.S. Ahuja, for Petitioner Advocate General, for Respondent.

ORDER

1. The petitioner is convicted and sentenced for committing the offence under Section 325 I.P.C. He is sentenced to simple imprisonment of two months for this offence.

2. Simple facts of the case are that according to the prosecution the petitioner-accused is a nephew of the injured person Lahari Ram and litigation between the two is going on about some dispute over the agricultural land. It is said that on 1-12-1976 at about 4 P.M. when Lahari Ram was basking in sunlight along with his family members, namely, his wife Achhari Devi and daughter-in-law Biasa Devi, the accused suddenly came from behind with a Danda and gave Danda blows to Lahari Ram. Lahari Ram began to bleed. At the relevant time there was some marriage at the adjacent village with the result that many persons of the village, including the neighbours and some family members of the injured person had gone to attend that marriage. Therefore, Lahari Ram could not avail of the assistance of other villagers or neighbours. He was, however, taken to hospital at Sarkaghat by his wife Achhari Devi and admitted in the hospital on the next date, that is, 2-12-1976. The doctor on examination suspected some fracture. On X-ra











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top