OM PRAKASH
HARBANS LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
1. This appeal is directed against an order of the learned Sessions Judge Mandi and Chamba Sessions Division, convicting and sentencing the appellant, under sections 323 and 201 I. P. C. The case of the prosecution against the appellant, was as follows :
2. The appellant, Birchu Ram, Ramswarup and Rup Lal were employed in the Sutlej-Beas Link Project, at Sundarnagar. The appellant and Mirchu Ram were labourers. Ramswarup was a driller and Rup Lal was a Chaukidar of the store. The appellant, Mirchu Ram and Rup Lal lived in tents at Musahab-Ka-bagh. The appellant and Mirchu Ram were living in one tent, while Rup Lal was living in another adjoining tent. The appellant and Mirchu Ram used to pilfer kerosene oil from the store. Rup Lal used to warn them against their nefarious activity of committing theft. Ramswarup had instigated the appellant and Mirchu Ram to put an end to the life of Rup Lal. He had assured them that he would spend money to save them from any harm and would help them in every way.
3. On the night of the 6th July, 1963, Rup Lal was lying in his bed, in his tent. He had started abusing Mirchu Ram in connection with the stealing of kerosene oil. Mirchu Ram had re
1. AIR 1965 HP 1 (V 52) : 1965 (1) Cri LJ 35
2 AIR 1963 SC 1094 (V 50) : 1963 (2) Cri LJ 178
3. AIR 1963 SC 1113 (V 50) : 1963 (2) Cri LJ 182
4. AIR 1959 HP 3 (V 46) : 1959 Cri LJ 448
6. AIR 1958 SC 66 (V 45) : 1958 Cri LJ 238
8. AIR 1957 SC 216 (V 44) : 1957 Cri LJ 481
10. AIR 1954 SC 462 (V 41) : 1954 Cri LJ 1313
11. AIR 1953 SC 459 (V 40) : 1953 Cri LJ 1925
13. AIR 1939 All 665 (V 26) : 40 Cri LJ 948
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.