SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(HP) 18

R.S.PATHAK
NATIONAL RICE AND DAL MILLS, RAJPUR – Appellant
Versus
SURAJ SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. K. Goel, for Petitioners; R.K. Gupta and J.R. Thakur, for Respondent.

ORDER

1. This is a defendants revision petition against an order dated September 12, 1973, passed by the learned Senior Subordinate Judge, Mandi rejecting his application under Order 11, R. 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The learned Senior Subordinate Judge considered an affidavit necessary in support of the application under Order 11, Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and as no such affidavit was filed he rejected the application. Now, there can be no dispute that it is for the Court to be satisfied that a case exists for granting the relief claimed in such application. If the court considers that an affidavit is necessary for this purpose it is entitled to require the party to file such affidavit. It is also evident from Form No. 6 in Appendix C to the Code that an affidavit is contemplated when an application is made under Order 11, Rule 14. In the present case, it does not appear that any attempt was made to file an affidavit. In the circumstances, the learned Senior Subordinate Judge was entitled to reject the application, and his order doing so does not call for interference. It is, however, open to the defendant to file a fresh application under Order 11, R. 14 su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top