R.S.PATHAK
NATIONAL RICE AND DAL MILLS, RAJPUR – Appellant
Versus
SURAJ SINGH – Respondent
1. This is a defendants revision petition against an order dated September 12, 1973, passed by the learned Senior Subordinate Judge, Mandi rejecting his application under Order 11, R. 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. The learned Senior Subordinate Judge considered an affidavit necessary in support of the application under Order 11, Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and as no such affidavit was filed he rejected the application. Now, there can be no dispute that it is for the Court to be satisfied that a case exists for granting the relief claimed in such application. If the court considers that an affidavit is necessary for this purpose it is entitled to require the party to file such affidavit. It is also evident from Form No. 6 in Appendix C to the Code that an affidavit is contemplated when an application is made under Order 11, Rule 14. In the present case, it does not appear that any attempt was made to file an affidavit. In the circumstances, the learned Senior Subordinate Judge was entitled to reject the application, and his order doing so does not call for interference. It is, however, open to the defendant to file a fresh application under Order 11, R. 14 su
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.