1. This is a plaintiffs revision petition against an appellate order of the learned District Judge, Kangra vacating an interim injunction granted by the trial court. 1A. The plaintiff, Roshan Lal, purchased a parcel of land of which the defendant, Ratto, was tenant, Ratto filed a suit for possession by way of pre-emption and was held entitled to pre-empt a one third share of the land. Accordingly, he became owner of the one third share. Roshan Lal instituted partition proceedings, and the Assistant Collector made an order directing partition. Physical possession of a two third share was delivered to Roshan Lal, Ratto applied to the Assistant Collector that physical possession had been wrongly delivered to Roshan Lal inasmuch as he, Ratto, continued as tenant in that share of the land. The Assistant Collector accepted the plea, and ordered physical possession restored to Ratto. An appeal by Roshan Lal was rejected by the Collector. On April 25, 1973 Roshan Lal filed the present suit for a declaration that he was the owner in possession of the land and for a permanent injunction restraining Ratto from interfering with his possession. Roshan Lal also applied under rules 1 and 2 o