D.B.LAL, C.R.THAKUR, R.S.PATHAK
RAJKUMAR RAJINDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
R. S. Pathak, C. J.:- The petitioners in this and the connected writ petitions challenge the validity of the Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 and the proceedings taken thereunder.
2. It may be mentioned that after a preliminary hearing of the writ petitions we found it desirable, in view of the nature of the questions raised before us, that learned counsel for the parties should file a written statement of their submissions and learned counsel were informed that during the oral hearing of the writ petitions they would be confined to the points set out in their respective statements. Written statements of submissions have been filed by Shri R.N. Malhotra, Shri H.S. Thakur and Shri K.D. Sud and they have orally argued their case on that basis. Learned counsel for the remaining petitioners have adopted the submissions so made.
3. The Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned Act) was passed by the Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly on December 21, 1972 and received the assent of the President of India on July 10, 1973. Subsequently it was amended by the Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.