SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(HP) 242

KULDIP SINGH
Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :- Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:- Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Kuldip Singh, J.) - The appellant was petitioner, who filed petition against respondent under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) for dissolution of marriage which was dismissed by the learned District Judge, Solan, hence, the petitioner husband has come to appeal against the judgment, decree dated 9.5.2003 passed in H.M. Petition No. 47-S/3 of 2001.

2.The facts, in brief, are that appellant filed a petition under Section 13 of the Act for dissolution of marriage which was solemnized by him with respondent on 4.5.1992. The grievance of the appellant, projected by him in the petition, is that parties lived together for brief time at village Sai, Tehsil Arki. The appellant was working at Shimla in I.B. and the respondent was working as JBT Teacher in Government Primary School, Surajpur (Piplughat). In January, 1996 appellant was transferred to Chandigarh and respondent was also transferred to Government Primary School, Balera. The respondent stayed at village Sai till January, 1997 with the family of the appellant. It has been alleged that during this period her conduct with her in-laws was rough and dominating. She used to insult the pare















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top