SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(HP) 541

KULDIP SINGH
Sat Pal – Appellant
Versus
Harjit Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :- Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate.
For the Respondent:- Mr. N.K. Thakur, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Kuldip Singh, J.) - The husband has come in appeal against the judgment, decree dated 5.12.2002 passed by learned District Judge, Una dismissing the petition of the husband for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and that the wife has not joined the company of the husband despite decree of restitution of conjugal rights.

2.The facts of the case, in brief, are that appellant on 22.6.1998 filed a petition for granting a decree of divorce against respondent on the ground that she did not join his company despite decree of restitution of conjugal rights and she has treated him with cruelty. It has been pleaded that the marriage between the parties took place on 18.11.1990 and a son was born to the parties from the wedlock on 2.2.1992 who is living with respondent. The respondent deserted the appellant, who filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) which was allowed on 23.3.1994 and a decree of restitution of conjugal rights was passed, but respondent did not join the company of appellant, he filed a divorce petition against respondent which was compromised and withdrawn on 26.3.1996.

3.On t






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top