P.D.DESAI, V.P.GUPTA
Himachal Road Transport Corporation Shimla – Appellant
Versus
Sushila Devi – Respondent
P.D. DESAI, C.J.:- The case has been listed before us today because the appellant has failed to comply with the following order made in C.M.P. No. 1203 of 1984:-
"The appellant-applicant will deposit the awarded amount together with costs and interest in the Registry of this Court within a period of four weeks from today after deducting from such amount, the amount paid under the Passenger Insurance Scheme as well as the amount, if any, paid by way of interim relief by the appellant-applicant to the claimants (respondents).
This order is not to be treated as a precedent for any purpose whatsoever.
In view of the order of deposit made as aforesaid, the execution of the award against the appellant-applicant is stayed.
To be listed for admission after the deposit is made."
2. The appeal arises out of an award made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Mandi, Kullu, and Lauhal and Spitti Districts, in a claim petition lodged under S.110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Under the impugned award, respondents Nos.1 and 2 have been awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.1,09,000-64 paise with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from the date of the award till the deposit of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.