SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(HP) 138

A.L.VAIDYA
Mool Raj – Appellant
Versus
Jamna Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Anand Sharma, for Appellant; Mr. S. S. Kanwar, for Respondent No. 1.

JUDGMENT:- Smt. Jamna Devi respondent executed a gift deed in favour of the defendants of the property owned by her. The gift deed was pleaded to be conditional one and the condition was that the defendants would render services to her. As the defendants did not comply with the condition of the gift deed, therefore, Smt. Jamna Devi filed a suit for possession of the gifted land as, according to her, by non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of the gift deed the same should be revoked. She also pleaded that the parties, being Rajput by caste and agriculturists by occupation, were governed by custom, which amongst them was that a conditional gift in lieu of services was liable to be revoked, if the condition was not fulfilled.

2. The defendants contested the suit and pleaded that the gift was irrevocable, being unconditional one. On merit, they pleaded that they have been rendering the services to the plaintiff. The suit was also resisted on the ground of locus standi, limitation, res judicata and maintainability.

3. The trial Court framed the following Issues on the pleading of the parties :

1. Whether the gift deed dated 26-5-1973 was conditional. If so, to what effect ? OPP

2. W






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top