SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(HP) 1

DEV DARSHAN SUD
Ramesh Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Akash Sharma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K. D. Sood, for Appellant; Bimal Gupta, for Respondent.

ORDER :- This is the husband's appeal against the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge, dismissing the petition instituted by the husband against the wife on the ground of divorce under Section 13(1)(a) and (b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

2. The parties were married on 1st March, 1979 at Pathankot. A male child was born to them on 27-2-1982. The appellant alleges that they lived together for 1½ years and the respondent has withdrawn from the company of the appellant without any lawful excuse. She used to quarrel constantly and has not joined his company on the pretext that the appellant is having illicit sexual relations with his sister-in-law (Bhabhi) Smt. Sushma, which allegations have not been substantiated by her. His further allegation is that in 1981 when he was employed and posted at Indora the respondent, used to visit his office and the residences of his superior officers using abusive language against him, humiliated him in the presence of his colleagues and superior officers. All these acts caused mental cruelty to the appellant. The respondent had filed two divorce petitions. These were compromised in the fervent























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top