RAJIV SHARMA
Kewal Singh – Appellant
Versus
H. R. T. C. – Respondent
(Rajiv Sharma, J.) (Oral) - The petitioner was appointed as driver on 30th April, 1991. He was put under probation for a period of two years. The period of probation was extended by another one year and this period of probation was to expire on 2nd May, 1994. Disciplinary proceedings were also initiated against the petitioner on 28th September, 1993.
2. A memorandum dated 1st October, 1993 was also issued to the petitioner. The operative portion of this memorandum reads thus :-
“Therefore, keeping in view the above mentioned position, the undersigned has tentatively reached the conclusion that Sh. Kewal Singh, driver under probation, is removed from service. Sh. Kewal Singh, Driver is granted one opportunity of representing against the above proposed penalty. But, the representation should be based on facts that the above representation would be considered by the undersigned if he wants to make such representation, the same should be received by undersigned within 15 days of the receipt of this Memo and the same will not be accepted after the said period. The above mentioned Memorandum may be duly acknowledged.”
3. He submitted reply to the same on 14th Octobe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.