SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(HP) 238

RAJIV SHARMA
Kewal Singh – Appellant
Versus
H. R. T. C. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:- Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents:- Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Rajiv Sharma, J.) (Oral) - The petitioner was appointed as driver on 30th April, 1991. He was put under probation for a period of two years. The period of probation was extended by another one year and this period of probation was to expire on 2nd May, 1994. Disciplinary proceedings were also initiated against the petitioner on 28th September, 1993.

2. A memorandum dated 1st October, 1993 was also issued to the petitioner. The operative portion of this memorandum reads thus :-

“Therefore, keeping in view the above mentioned position, the undersigned has tentatively reached the conclusion that Sh. Kewal Singh, driver under probation, is removed from service. Sh. Kewal Singh, Driver is granted one opportunity of representing against the above proposed penalty. But, the representation should be based on facts that the above representation would be considered by the undersigned if he wants to make such representation, the same should be received by undersigned within 15 days of the receipt of this Memo and the same will not be accepted after the said period. The above mentioned Memorandum may be duly acknowledged.”

3. He submitted reply to the same on 14th Octobe











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top