SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(HP) 18

CHET RAM THAKUR
Shiv Parshad – Appellant
Versus
Shila Rani – Respondent


Advocates:
H.S. Thakur, for Petitioner; A.C. Sud and K.D. Sud, for Respondent.

Judgement

ORDER :- This revision has been filed by Shiv Parshad against the order of the Appellate Authority, Solan, dismissing his appeal against the order of the Rent Controller ordering his eviction from the premises situate in Khasra Plot No. 941/831/3, Khewat No. 209, Khatauni No. 343 of village Ser Pargana Takroli, Tehsil Solan. The petitioner was in occupation of the premises. Smt. Shilla Rani who is now respondent in this Court alleged herself to be the landlady of the premises and she filed the application under the provisions of Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act for the eviction of the present petitioner on the ground that he was in arrears of rent to the tune of Rs. 126/- and that she required the premises for her bona fide use. The present petitioner resisted the application pleading inter alia that there was no relationship of landlady and tenant between the parties and that he was not served with a notice as is required under Section 106, T. P. Act and that the petition was liable to be dismissed on the ground that the premises were outside the municipal limits and that the petition had been filed with a mala fide intention.

2. The Rent Controller











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top