SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(HP) 2

D.B.LAL
Lim and Co. – Appellant
Versus
K. M. Sayeed – Respondent


Advocates:
K.D. Sud, for Petitioner;S. Malhotra, for Respondent.

Judgement

ORDER:- This is a civil revision under Section 115 Civil Procedure Code and has been directed against the order dated 28-11-1970 of the Rent Controller, Simla. The facts which give rise to this petition may be stated.

2. Lt. Col. K.M. Sayeed and four others claimed to be trustees of a certain Muslim Trust which is stated to own some properties in the town Simla. They filed a petition before the Rent Controller for the eviction of the respondents who are their tenants. During the course of litigation, two of the trustees tendered resignation and in their place the Government appointed one Dr. Yusuf Hussain Khan as a new trustee. Accordingly an application was given by the petitioners that Dr. Yusuf Hussian Khan be substituted in place of the two trustees who have since resigned. The learned Rent Controller importing the provisions of Order 22, Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code granted the prayer and ordered for the substitution. The respondents have felt aggrieved of the decision and have come up in revision.

3. It was contended at the outset, that the revision petition is not maintainable because an appeal could be filed either under Order 43, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top